Monday, Monday.
* The Criterion Collection Bottle Rocket is out tomorrow. Here's the Amazon link.
* Nate Silver projects Al Franken will win by 27 votes.
* The World's Best Colleges and Universities. Duke clocks in at #13, but more important, longtime domestic loser Case Western (#90) beats Tufts (#156) in the far more important world rankings, finally giving Neil the humiliation he deserves.
* Amanda Marcotte had the bright idea of reading Mad Men alongside some of the literary texts it makes allusions to, most notably the Frank O'Hara poem that bookends the season, "Meditations in an Emergency."
* Longtime reader Eli Glasner has a great new film blog.
* 10 Stories Behind Dr. Seuss stories. Thanks, Lindsay!
* "Who Stole My Volcano? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Dematerialisation of Supervillain Architecture." Via Neilalien.
* A school in New York has already been renamed for Barack Obama. Students initiated the renaming.
* The things you learn from Poli-Sci-Fi Radio: Val Kilmer is mulling a run for governor of New Mexico. Kilmer's only the second-worst Batman, but the one I think I'd want least in elected office.
* Top 25 Comic Book Battles. #1: Batman vs. Superman from The Dark Knight Returns.
* Heroes creator Tim Kring has apologized for calling his fans dipshits. Remember, a gaffe is when you accidentally tell the truth...
Monday, November 24, 2008
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
8:43 AM
|
Labels: academia, Al Franken, architecture, Barack Obama, Batman, blogs, Bond villains, cartoonish supervillainy, Case, children's literature, comics, dipshits, Dr. Seuss, Duke, film, Frank O'Hara, gaffes, Heroes, James Bond, literature, Mad Men, Minnesota, Nate Silver, Neil, New Mexico, poetry, Poli-Sci-Fi Radio, politics, science fiction, Superman, television, The Dark Knight Returns, the Senate, Tufts, Val Kilmer, Won't somebody think of the children?
Thursday, September 25, 2008
When books could change your life: why what we pore over at 12 may be the most important reading we ever do. Via MeFi.
There is a kind of no man's land in the literary landscape that can't be called "children's" or "young adult"--it's recognized as serious literature, if a little patronizingly, by the adult world--but which has a specific and perennial appeal to adolescents. I'm thinking here of writers such as J.D. Salinger and Kurt Vonnegut Jr., those staples of the college dorm. We reserve a special reverence for these authors that is qualitatively different from the respect, even awe, we feel for undeniably great writers like Toni Morrison or Cormac McCarthy--it's less rational or open to critical discussion. The reaction to revelations of the usual mundane human failings in recent biographies of figures beloved from childhood, such as Ray Bradbury or Charles Schulz, has been not just the surprise or sad worldly shrug we might expect but hostility and denial--a sense that we ought not to have been told such things, as if we'd been told once more that Santa Claus wasn't real or Shoeless Joe threw the series. And Joyce Maynard and Margaret Salinger's troubling memoirs about Salinger--we didn't want to know. Salinger and Vonnegut both give voice to the adolescent passion for justice, their dogmatic, almost fanatical, fairness and decency, and their blooming disgust at the epiphany that the world adults are foisting on them is neither fair nor decent.
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
9:42 PM
|
Labels: books, children's literature, J.D. Salinger, literature, the adolescent passion for justice, Vonnegut
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Guernica interviews Ursula K. Le Guin. Via Enter the Octopus.
Guernica: Do you ever feel that the way your work has been cordoned at times as science fiction is a deflection by the mainstream of the very serious critiques these novels contain of our society?
Ursula K. Le Guin: Yes. I do.
Guernica: Or is it sexism?
Ursula K. Le Guin: Yes. It is.
Guernica: Was there a moment when you realized the shift in the way you were being treated, when you became taken more seriously by the literary establishment, and do you remember it precisely? To an outsider, it appears recent.
Ursula K. Le Guin: Actually, I haven’t felt a major shift. I am still mostly referred to (dismissed) as a “sci fi writer.” When Margaret Atwood writes a serious review of one of my books for the New York Times, it is printed under the title “The Queen of Quinkdom,” to make sure nobody takes it seriously. I am shortlisted for major awards, but the awards go to people like De Lillo and MacCarthy who also write science fiction, using the tropes and loci and metaphors of science fiction, but fastidiously keep their literary skirts from being defiled by the name of genre.
I admire Doris Lessing for calling her science-fiction books science fiction; I only wish I liked the books. Atwood herself has walked a very fine and sometimes wavering line trying to keep her science fiction books out of the genre ghetto without trashing the people who live in the ghetto. I can’t wait for people like Michael Chabon to finish chainsawing that damn thorn hedge and knocking down all the genre walls. Now, there’s a man with courage, Chabon. He just joined the Science Fiction Writers Association. He steps over the walls in both directions.
Most recently, my three books of the Annals of the Western Shore have been ignored by both the science fiction community and the literary critics, because they are published as “young adult.” The label YA actually means nothing except that the protagonists, or some of them, are young. Publishers like it because it is a secure marketing niche. But the cost of security is exclusion from literary consideration. The walls of disdain around any book perceived as being “for children” are much higher than they were when I began publishing the Earthsea books, forty years ago. Oh, Joshua, won’t you blow your horn?
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
7:47 AM
|
Labels: children's literature, critique, Doris Lessing, genre, literature, Margaret Atwood, Michael Chabon, science fiction, Ursula K. Le Guin, young adult literature
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
I never read the Anne of Green Gables books, but most of the women I know were big fans when they were kids. So here's a little something for the ladies: Margaret Atwood remembers the 100-year-old classic.
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
11:23 AM
|
Labels: Anne of Green Gables, children's literature, Margaret Atwood, things other people are nostalgic for