But can we talk about the real criminals? Are we really going to stand back and let these monsters further desecrate the corpse of Indiana Jones?
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
4:23 PM
|
Labels: film, George Lucas, Indiana Jones, Shia Labeouf, Stephen Spielberg
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Behold the 125-page transcript of the conference between George Lucas, Stephen Spielberg, and Lawrence Kasdan brainstorming Raiders of the Lost Ark. Discussion at MetaFilter.
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
2:29 PM
|
Labels: film, George Lucas, Indiana Jones, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Stephen Spielberg
Monday, July 28, 2008
Being George Lucas: The Times has a long, wide-ranging interview with the man himself, touching on everything from his quasi-religious relationship with Star Wars canonicity to the chilling possibility of yet another Indiana Jones sequel. Via AICN.
“We were hoping for box-office figures like that, which is, ultimately, with inflation, what the others have done, within 10%,” Lucas explains. “So, we squeaked up there. Really, though, it was a challenge getting the story together and getting everybody to agree on it. Indiana Jones only becomes complicated when you have another two people saying ‘I want it this way’ and ‘I want it that way’, whereas, when I first did Jones, I just said, ‘We’ll do it this way’ — and that was much easier. But now I have to accommodate everybody, because they are all big, successful guys, too, so it’s a little hard on a practical level.
“If I can come up with another idea that they like, we’ll do another. Really, with the last one, Steven wasn’t that enthusiastic. I was trying to persuade him. But now Steve is more amenable to doing another one. Yet we still have the issues about the direction we’d like to take. I’m in the future; Steven’s in the past. He’s trying to drag it back to the way they were, I’m trying to push it to a whole different place. So, still we have a sort of tension. This recent one came out of that. It’s kind of a hybrid of our own two ideas, so we’ll see where we are able to take the next one.”
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
10:19 PM
|
Labels: canonicity, film, George Lucas, Indiana Jones, nuking the fridge, Star Wars, Stephen Spielberg
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is not a rumination on the ravages of age, though early in the movie it briefly pretends to be. Nor is it an examination of the Cold War's culture of paranoia and suspicion—though it has a little bit of that too—nor is it about the way power ultimately looks the same whatever uniform it happens to wear or which flag it claims to fight under, nor about Chariot of the Gods and saucer men from Mars. In the end, it's about being an Indiana Jones movie, which is to say it's all about car chases, booby traps, clever in-jokes, and the sheer, unstoppable force that is Harrison Ford's charisma.
And it does this job quite well.
Now, if I were inclined to look at Indiana Jones with anything like a critical mind, I'm sure I'd find plenty of negative things to say about this movie, from a story that's strikingly light on character or emotional depth (even for its genre) to more than a few embarrassingly silly plot moments to a characteristically Lucasian overreliance on CGI. (Don't even get me started on politics, postcoloniality, or heteronormativity.) El Dorado is a good MacGuffin, but it just doesn't pack the same mythic punch as the Lost Ark or the Quest for the Grail—and while I thought the alien stuff was pretty well-handled overall, fundamentally there's a style mismatch here that approaches the level of category error.
And of course on some pure plane of aesthetic valuation it must be said that Lucas and Spielberg should have resisted the temptation to mess with perfection and let Last Crusade stand as the proper ending to this story it's always been. In this sense Crystal Skull is actually worse than superfluous—the need to return to Indy, 20 years on, undercuts and arguably destroys entirely the narrative arc that somehow took the cartoon hero of Raiders and turned him into a human being. Last Crusade didn't need a sequel; the trilogy was already a complete story, not Episodes 44-46 in the 108 Adventures of Indiana Jones.
Phantom Menance betrayed us right up front, and was pretty noisy about it. What Crystal Skull does is quieter, subtler, and perhaps ultimately more devastating to its franchise: it takes that human being from Crusade and turns him back to a cartoon again.
If I were inclined to look at Indiana Jones critically, I'm saying, I think I'd have a pretty ambivalent view of Crystal Skull. But tonight I'm not at all inclined to do any of that—I watched Indiana Jones tonight as I always do, with the spellbound eyes of my twelve-year-old self, and he liked the movie just fine.
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
10:40 PM
|
Labels: aesthetics, aliens, ambivalence, Chariot of the Gods, criticism, everybody's got their something, film, George Lucas, Indiana Jones, my twelve-year-old self, nostalgia, over-educated literary theory PhDs, Phantom Menace, Star Wars, Stephen Spielberg
Thursday, February 14, 2008
The only news today is the release of the Indiana Jones 4 trailer. Yes, Harrison Ford can.
Damn, I thought that was closer.
Let this mark the first time in a long time I felt really happy with anything George Lucas had gone anywhere near.
Posted by
Gerry Canavan
at
10:10 AM
|
Labels: aliens, film, George Lucas, Harrison Ford, Indiana Jones, nostalgia, Roswell, science fiction, Stephen Spielberg